Skip to main content

Irrisept Antimicrobial Wound Lavage is available to order for irrigation needs to address the national saline shortage.
Please visit our ORDER page for next steps.

Irrisept Antimicrobial Wound Lavage

Self-contained jet lavage with low concentration CHG as a preservative in the bottled solution.

Contact a Rep

Don’t let your best efforts get diminished by the worst microorganisms...

Do Your Best Against the Worst—
Add Irrisept to your irrigation plan.

When selecting irrigation, does your choice provide:

  • Low pressure irrigation to remove foreign materials, cellular debris and bacterial contaminants2
  • A proven preservative, like CHG, that offers broad spectrum activity against a variety of microorganisms in the bottled solution3
  • An extensive safety profile including in-vivo and in-vitro studies and RCT data4-5
  • Evidence, including independent and 3rd party research3-13
  • Ease of use; a simple device that’s ready to use in seconds
Do Your Best Against the Worst—
Add Irrisept to your irrigation plan.

When selecting irrigation, does your choice provide:

  • Pressurized irrigation to remove foreign materials, cellular debris and bacterial contaminants2
  • A proven preservative, like CHG, that offers broad spectrum activity against a variety of microorganisms in the bottled solution3
  • An extensive safety profile including in-vivo and in-vitro studies and RCT data.4
  • Evidence, including independent and 3rd party lresearch3-13
  • Ease of use; a simple device that’s ready to use in seconds
What if a simple irrigation device could impact your patient’s care?
Contact a Rep
Where can Irrisept make a difference?

Irrisept Antimicrobial Wound Lavage can be used across the continuum of care in a variety of healthcare settings.

Pre-Hospital & Field Care

Learn More

Acute Wound Care

Learn More

Post-Acute Wound Care

Learn More
Why Irrisept?
  • 0.05% CHG, the right concentration
    Irrisept provides low concentration CHG in 99.95% Sterile Water for Irrigation, USP. At this concentration, CHG is non-cytotoxic while demonstrating effectiveness as a preservative against a variety of gram-positive and gram-negative bacteria, fungi, and some viruses in the bottled solution.3-4
  • Irrigation​ with pressure
    Irrisept can deliver low-pressure irrigation through manual compression or spikeable/instillable connections with powered irrigation devices. Low-pressure irrigation is recommended by both the American College of Surgeons (ACS) and the International Wound Infection Institute (IWII).15-16 It is intended for mechanical cleansing and removal of debris, dirt and foreign materials including microorganisms from wounds.
  • Backed by testing and independent research
    Irrisept has undergone extensive testing, including 3rd party research, and is referenced by name and/or concentration in many independent publications.3-13
  • A safety profile like no other
    Irrisept is non-cytotoxic and features extensive safety testing, including in-vivo and in-vitro studies and RCT data.3-5
  • Designed with ease of use in mind
    Designed with ease of use in mind: Irrisept is available in multiple sizes and configurations and can be delivered by the method of your choosing. Shipped ready to open and use-no mixing or diluting required.

A New Standard of Care

Ready to upgrade your wound management plan?
Contact a Rep
About Irrisept
About Irrisept

References

  • 1. Bowler, P. et al. (2001). Wound Microbiology and Associated Approaches to Wound Management. Clin Micro Review, 244- 269.https://doi10.1128/CMR.14.2.244-269.2001
  • 2. Lewis, K., & Pay, J. (2021, January). Wound Irrigation. NCBI Bookshelf. https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/books/NBK538522/
  • 3. (2022). KTK Summary. Doc. 537161 V5 Evaluation of CHG as a preservative in the solution
  • 4. Biocompatibility Matrix. Data on file at Irrimax Corp. Lawrenceville, GA
  • 5. (2022). Protocol CLP-01: An Independent Review of Safety Data From a Closed Clinical Study Using Irrisept (Protocol # IRR-CT-901-2013-01)
  • 6. Spencer et al. (2017). Reduction in Colon Surgical Site Infections Using CHG Irrigant Solution [Conference Presentation]. AORN 2017, Boston, MA
  • 7. Truitt, K., & Kleinheinz, S. (2017). Target Zero: Eliminating Surgical Site Infection With 0.05% CHG Jet Lavage Irrigation [Conference Presentation]. AORN 2017, Boston, MA
  • 8. Dotson, N., Rasheid, S., Marcet, J., & Sanchez, J. (2015). In Irrigation of Incisions With 0.05% CHG Reduces Surgical Site Infections in Colorectal Surgery [Conference Presentation]. ASCRS 2015, Boston, MA
  • 9. Merceron et al. (2019). Comparison of Complications Following Implant-Based Breast Reconstruction Using Triple Antibiotic Solution Versus Low Concentration Chlorhexidine Gluconate Solution. Mod Plas Surg, 09(04), 74–85. https:// doi.org/10.4236/mps.2019.94010
  • 10. Mangold et al. (2019). Standardising Intraoperative Irrigation with 0.05% Chlorhexidine Gluconate in Caesarean Delivery to Reduce Surgical Site Infections: A Single Institution Experience. J Peri Practice, 30(1-2), 24–33. https://doi.org/10.1177/1750458919850727
  • 11. Lung et al. (2022). Chlorhexidine Gluconate Lavage During Total Joint Arthroplasty May Improve Wound Healing Compared to Dilute Betadine. J Exp Ortho, 9(1). https://doi.org/10.1186/s40634-022-00503-w
  • 12. Driesman et al. (2020). Perioperative Chlorhexidine Gluconate Wash During Joint Arthroplasty has Equivalent Periprosthetic Joint Infection Rates in Comparison to Betadine Wash. J Arthroplasty, 35(3), 845–848. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.arth.2019.10.009
  • 13. Frisch et al. (2017). Intraoperative Chlorhexidine Irrigation to Prevent Infection in Total Hip and Knee Arthroplasty. Arth Today, 3(4), 294–297. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.artd.2017.03.005
  • 14. Data on file at Irrimax Corp., Lawrenceville, GA
  • 15. Ashley et al. (2014). Acute Wound Care. ACS Surgery: Princ Prac . (7th ed., pp. 215–216). Decker Intellectual Properties Inc.
  • 16. International Wound Infection Institute (IWII). (2022 update). Wound Infection in Clinical Practice: Principles of Best Practice. International Consensus Update. pp. 26-27
Skip to content